I heard that the German chancellor recently said that our American forefathers got it right by forcing people who chose to become citizens of a country, must assimilate into the mainstream of that country's culture. Why? In order for a country to survive there can only be one “national” culture that brings all other cultures to the table for the common good of the country and it’s people.
When people of different cultures, living together, are not taught how to live together, they will kill each other. Saddam bin Hussein had three cultures living in Iraq who did not peacefully assimilate: Kurd, Shiites, and the Sunni. He tried wiping out the Kurd who occupied part of Iraq in the North. They were not considered valued citizens, only occupiers.
Although, Saddam Hussein is dead, these groups are still killing each other within their own borders.
The German Chancellor realized their own mistake when they allowed another culture to live in Germany without assimilating; that is, they were not required to learn German, they were allowed to live together in one area, practicing only what they brought with them from their mother country. It was enough separation of the different cultures within the host country to cause minor civil unrest.
There are Americans who believe America is a country that was created by God to be “exceptional.” There is a reason for this attitude and we need leaders, especially a President who believes it, also.
America is the only “super power" that is built from the ground up by "immigrants." We are a "melting pot” of exceptional human beings because of the laws and principles established by our forefathers. These laws and principles were created to strengthen America by including all cultures and races from different countries. History will show that these laws were successful.
When American soldiers first landed in France during WWII, they were still green from having just completed boot camp. The French had been fighting a German army unit that had taken over one of their towns. They could not kick out the German occupying unit no matter how many times they tried. The French balked at the idea that a bunch of American "mutts" could do the job. What they could not do in months of fighting in their own country of inbred nationals; the American mutts of varying cultures kicked out the Germans in that town. Their differences made them stronger. They had fought together side by side in two great world wars to free other cultures from genocide, and free other countries from hostile invasion.
The reasoning for assimilating immigrants into the American mainstream should be taught in every high school in America. America cannot survive without this process. All immigrants must learn English and the United States Constitution; bringing them into the American mainstream will serve a common national interest that serves all people who want to live in the United States.
This does not means ‘taking from, or weakening, one individual to satisfy another. It means educating an immigrant for the sole purpose to integrate them into their new chosen cultural surroundings. To ask "less" is to allow ignorance to penetrate and weaken the United States. What some students in America failed to learn or to be taught in school is that our government ‘once’ insisted that all illegal immigrants, who wanted to live in America, had to “assimilate into the American mainstream which included learning English and the United States Constitution.
Some Americans are privileged to be born in this country, without knowing why they were given so much freedom to express your ‘politically correct’ nonsense. There is a reason it is called 'political' correct; and not 'common sense.' For instance, those who reject "English" as the national language of America only encourage a division among people by language and culture; separating them and weakening the country. We would just become another culturally divided country with ongoing civil wars. For those who think we should have another national language other than English; Spanish is already a national language in another country.
Unfortunately, the consequences of being ignorant is already prevalent among American citizens whose education is being influenced by propaganda, instead of history.
We heard propaganda coming from President Obama and his wife:
“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” — Barack Obama, October 30, 2008
“We are going to have to change our conversation; we’re going to have to change our traditions, our history; we’re going to have to move into a different place as a nation.” — Michelle Obama, May 14, 2008
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/10/01/obama_transforming_america_120170.html#ixzz2rfFIiaSc
America does not need to "fundamentally" transform or "change our traditions" or "history" especially by someone who has gone to great lengths to legally conceal his college grades from the public. It would be nice to know about his history before he changes America's history.
The President has made it his legacy to destroy what our forefathers made successful for over 230 years?
America is a country with a rich cultural heritage of its own; however young. It does not deny immigrants their cultural heritage when they chose to become American citizens. They have a cultural richness that adds to their new chosen country. Their homes and communities practice and share the best parts of their heritage.
Despite those privilege American citizens who follow President Obama's divisive propaganda, I am hopeful that there will come underprivileged immigrants who would rather be educated, and go the way of our forefathers, by assimilating into the rich American culture through an educational system where they can enjoy the same freedom as all American citizens.
God Bless America
January 27, 2014
Sunday, September 7, 2014
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Social Inequality Among Blacks?
There is a book "From Plantation to Ghetto" by August Meier and Elliott M. Rudwich, written as a high school text book, 1966.
Yes, there was plenty of discrimination all through the history of America against the Black man.
I tried to understand the pain and the hatred they felt by imaging how I would have felt being Black in that time.
Yes, there was plenty of discrimination all through the history of America against the Black man.
Cover via Amazon |
The white man had the vote and power to manipulate the laws, unjustly, against the Black people. There were laws on multiple levels of government in different states corralling the Black people from one end of the justice system to the other. Where to run; where to hide.
One year a vote would give Black men the right to buy and own land.
The following year, the law changed against the Black man who
One year a vote would give Black men the right to buy and own land.
The following year, the law changed against the Black man who
had since used his entire savings to buy land; only to have the government take it away from him, including all their livelihood, profits, and savings. I am surprised the Black people did not kill every White person in their path. I know I would have felt that way.
Instead, they suffered and tried to change the laws through political means when they could not vote. When they could vote and were elected to office, they had little influence.
Instead, they suffered and tried to change the laws through political means when they could not vote. When they could vote and were elected to office, they had little influence.
Unfortunately, the Black people had two strikes against them.
Not only were there discrimination from Whites, but from Blacks.
There were plenty of discrimination within the Black communities also. The Black organizations had their own cast system. Some
organizations only accepted light colored Black men. Others, only
accepted dark colored men.
Some Black men who were freed from slavery, also, acquired Black slaves.
They did not feel the injustice towards their own skin color.
Freed Black men bought and sold their Black brothers and sisters just like the Whites. Color and race were not the issue, it was survival. It was human nature
to want a better life.
It seemed easier for a White person to own a Black person,
but how easy was it for a Black person to own another Black person?
How easy is it for President Obama to say he cares about
the Black people of America when there are more Black people
unemployed under his leadership
than any other President in history. Why is that?
Not only were there discrimination from Whites, but from Blacks.
There were plenty of discrimination within the Black communities also. The Black organizations had their own cast system. Some
organizations only accepted light colored Black men. Others, only
accepted dark colored men.
Some Black men who were freed from slavery, also, acquired Black slaves.
They did not feel the injustice towards their own skin color.
Freed Black men bought and sold their Black brothers and sisters just like the Whites. Color and race were not the issue, it was survival. It was human nature
to want a better life.
It seemed easier for a White person to own a Black person,
but how easy was it for a Black person to own another Black person?
How easy is it for President Obama to say he cares about
the Black people of America when there are more Black people
unemployed under his leadership
than any other President in history. Why is that?
Since this little bit of history proves that Human Nature will react, unjustly, to their own kind, when given the opportunity to vent deep seeded feelings of their own social inequality, and when those feelings are not steeped in morality.
Of the freed Black men, not all took slaves. Some did not need slaves to
work the land. Frederick Douglass used his education and power of persuasion to educate the Black people who wanted social equality.
I believe, that in today's society, the racial divide would not
exist if it were not fueled by those few Liberals in power who still want to
harness those 1800s-feelings of social inequality.
Liberals like the Al Sharptons', Pres. and Mrs Obamas', DOJ Eric Holders'...
Of the freed Black men, not all took slaves. Some did not need slaves to
work the land. Frederick Douglass used his education and power of persuasion to educate the Black people who wanted social equality.
I believe, that in today's society, the racial divide would not
exist if it were not fueled by those few Liberals in power who still want to
harness those 1800s-feelings of social inequality.
Liberals like the Al Sharptons', Pres. and Mrs Obamas', DOJ Eric Holders'...
are the present day Black leaders and upstarts because
they hold the highest offices in America and use that position to brainwash
poor Black people into believing that they don't have the same opportunities.
If there is so much social inequality in America, how is it that President Obama and DOJ Holder reached the highest office in the country?
poor Black people into believing that they don't have the same opportunities.
If there is so much social inequality in America, how is it that President Obama and DOJ Holder reached the highest office in the country?
It was human nature, not the color of ones skin, for Black slave owners in the 1800s to own Black slaves to work the land in order to succeed.
It is the Sharptons', Obamas', the Holders', the Slave masters of the world who would lose
their power and status, if they let their people go, to be free to prosper in an America that
is the land of opportunity.
Rising tension between blacks and successful African/Carribean immigrants
"...Luvvie Ajayi, a Nigerian-born immigrant, tried to explain “akata,” a word some Nigerians use to refer to black Americans that translates into wild animal. (Note: A lot of Nigerians use akata to mean “ghetto” as well... the reason some Africans believe black Americans should be doing better is because they don’t know about the history of black Americans but see their own success as a reason blacks should excel as well. “Africans who come to the U.S. are statistically more successful than African Americans and they think ‘if I could do it, why not them?’” she wrote...."
The evidence of successful Blacks today who
did not fall for the social inequality hype:
L. Douglas Wilder was governor of Virginia from 1990 until 1994. His was a political career of many firsts: the grandson of slaves, he was the first African American elected governor of any state in America. He was the first black member of the Virginia Senate in the twentieth century. And he was the first African American to win statewide office in Virginia when he was elected lieutenant governor in 1985. A Democrat, he ran briefly for United States president in 1991 and in 2004 was elected mayor of ..
David Webb: Conservative African-American radio talk show host noted:
I'll use the most recent example: King Shamir Shabazz of the new Black Panther party stood at a polling place in Philadelphia carrying a batton threatening people and making statements like 'You're about to be ruled by the Black man.' That's an example of a racist group that advocates a racist rule and mantra. http://www.essence.com/2010/07/26/tea-party-365-co-founder-david-webb/
Jason Riley, a Wall Street Journal columnist.
Published “Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed."
Dr. Benjamin Carlson, “If we make every attempt to increase our knowledge in order to use it for human good, it will make a difference in us and in our world.”
― Ben Carson, Think Big: Unleashing Your
Potential for Excellence
Charles V Payne.
Born in Harlem to a single parent household, Mr. Charles V. Payne is
the Founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Analyst at Wall Street Strategies, Inc.
He was earlier the President and a Director at Wall Street Strategies.
Charles Payne recently criticized U.S. assistance programs like welfare and food
stamps, asserting they can start to make poverty feel “a little comfortable.”
These successful Black Americans are the educators and visionaries for the
Human Race; for all ethnic groups.
America from the beginning is a Melting Pot of Immigrants of all colors and
ethnic groups. The only thing that has changed are the laws that have made
it possible to have a Black president and Black attorney general,
holding the highest offices in America.
How can this be Social Inequality?
Saturday, August 23, 2014
The Beheading Of America By Obama
AMERICA has a MILITARY for the purpose to PROTECT and DEFEND all
Americans but it is clear that Obama thinks the Military belongs to him personally.
An American journalist was "beheaded" by the same group, ISIS, that Obama
has said:
"The analogy we use around here sometimes, and I think is accurate, is if a jayvee team puts on Lakers uniforms that doesn’t make them Kobe Bryant."
The Liberal media will not talk about Obama's lack of interest, knowledge or
concern for America or American lives.
Obama was on the golf course 6 minutes after his press conference of
acknowledging the BEHEADING of an American.
http://www.wcvb.com/news/isis-video-appears-to-show-journalist-james-foleys-beheading/27619126#!bIUqf2
Brian Bosché (@BrianBosche) tweeted at 7:04pm - 21 Aug 14:
@BarackObama Best cover I've seen in a long time... Short. Concise. Accurate. #VacationLeadership #Iraq #Tcot #Foleypic.twitter.com/iVoMkA3xwo(https://twitter.com/BrianBosche/status/502622198746853376)
Get the official Twitter app at https://twitter.com/download
An American that died because Obama thinks ISIS is not a threat.
Maybe, not a threat to President Obama because he uses the Armed Forces to protect his golf games and "hold up his umbrellas."
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2014/08/22/unlike-mission-accomplished-press-barely-mentions-obamas-jv-team-ridicul#ixzz3BF42YYsQ
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)